***Monday, June 14, 2021, at 9:00 a.m., Commissioners met in regular session with Chairman Dan Dinning, Commissioner Wally Cossairt, Commissioner Tim Bertling, Clerk Glenda Poston, and Deputy Clerk Michelle Rohrwasser.
Judge Rich Christensen joined the meeting to say hello to Commissioners and to provide a brief update on court matters to include public defense, Zoom proceedings, etc.
Judge Justin Julian joined the meeting.
Those present also briefly discussed high caseloads, jury selections and accommodating courtrooms for COVID-19 related social distancing.
8:59 a.m., Judge Julian and Judge Christensen left the meeting.
9:00 a.m., Road and Bridge Department Co-Superintendents Renee Nelson and Randy Morris joined the meeting to give the department report. Addressing Coordinator Trevor Kempton also joined the meeting. A written department report was provided.
Attorney Tevis Hull joined the meeting at 9:02 a.m.
Those present reviewed details regarding the finance agreement with Caterpillar Financial for the second motor grader. Attorney Hull briefly questioned the payment amount.
Mr. Morris reviewed the department report and said that Road and Bridge is moving chips to stockpile them near the snowmobile park off Highland Flats Road and back behind the mill in town for use on David Thompson Road, Heights Loop and roads in that vicinity. Road and Bridge is going to brush Highland Flats Hill and McArthur Lake Road near the Wyman property so they will be cleaning the ditch a bit. Durapatch work will also probably be done. Mr. Morris spoke of getting some of the calcium work completed. Chairman Dinning asked if applying the calcium in a heavy application was cost effective. Mr. Morris said he doesn’t know the answer and due to very dry conditions last year, even the calcium got dusty. Mr. Morris discussed putting rock on Turner Hill Road.
Commissioner Cossairt moved to sign the Caterpillar Financial Agreement for the second Caterpillar motor grader with the first payment due October 15th. Commissioner Bertling second. Motion passed unanimously.
Those present discussed matters pertaining to the addressing process and Mr. Kempton commented about the county hiring an outside firm to work in Planning and Zoning instead of hiring local people for that office. Mr. Kempton briefly discussed receiving angry phones calls from people pertaining to addressing delays, etc. Commissioners explained that in the past the county had employees in certain departments with no formal training and how applications for those departments got behind and errors were created due to that lack of training. Chairman Dinning stated that when Commissioners make a decision about hiring, it’s in the best interest of the public. Chairman Dinning said Mr. Kempton probably does receive angry phone calls, but Commissioners get those types of calls from everyone.
Chairman Dinning said there had been discussion about Mr. Kempton cutting his hours back and then they heard or interpreted information that Mr. Kempton was not interested in a fulltime position so Commissioners are looking into working with Innovate!, Inc. just in case Mr. Kempton chose to no longer work for the county. Chairman Dinning added that after the last meeting with Mr. Spinosa and Mr. Yost with Innovate!, Inc. he came back thinking that the county needs someone with experience to see where the county can improve its process and so Innovate!, Inc. could make themselves familiar with the work Mr. Kempton does. Mr. Kempton voiced his frustration in that questions were raised about the work he does at the last meeting, but nobody asked him. Mr. Kempton said Commissioners were looking for expertise and he has that expertise. Chairman Dinning said Commissioners needed to look into options for catching up on applications and Mr. Kempton didn’t sound interested in having more work hours.
Ms. Nelson said maybe she should’ve discussed the matter further with Commissioners. Commissioner Bertling said he would prefer to keep the position in-house as opposed to paying a higher amount per hour for a contractor. Commissioner Bertling said Innovate! Inc. mentioned certain computer programs and Mr. Kempton was familiar with those programs. Mr. Kempton said the county is currently disjointed with programs and it involves a bit more than just his position. Mr. Kempton commented that when he says he has expertise, he means it’s more than just assigning an address and he added that Commissioners don’t need to hire an outside firm as the expertise is there in-house. Commissioner Bertling said Mr. Kempton is saying we have the expertise in-house, but not that we’re caught up. Mr. Kempton said the biggest pinch point in this process is not with his position. The longest time period is with Ms. Nelson and he added that he’s not trying to throw her under the bus. Once an application comes from Ruen-Yeager and it’s complete, the longest period of time for that application is spent with Road and Bridge, because it’s another large part of Ms. Nelson’s work.
Planning and Zoning Department staff member Tessa Vogel joined the meeting.
Ms. Nelson said when an application comes in, she sets a certain amount of time aside for the day to address Planning and Zoning matters only and the Road and Bridge Office Assistant takes the office phone calls. Ms. Nelson said she also communicates with Janelle Allen and Clare Marley with Ruen-Yeager. The amount of time it takes does vary due to other Road and Bridge projects, getting information to County Civil Attorney Tevis Hull, etc., and there are only so many hours in a day. Ms. Nelson added that until she gets information going and processed, Mr. Kempton is stuck. Chairman Dinning spoke of Mr. Morris and Ms. Nelson having to spend a lot of time on this issue so he wanted to look to see if there is some way to streamline the process so their time could be spent better on road projects and the administrative side of work; so things could function better and they would not have to spend as much time.
Mr. Kempton said having a GIS Department would be a big help, but hiring Innovate! Inc. won’t help. Attorney Hull clarified that he’s never heard Commissioners say they would hire Innovate! Inc. and at this point it was just to do an analysis. Chairman Dinning said he just wanted Innovate!, Inc. to be familiar with what Mr. Kempton did in case he no longer wanted to work with the county. Mr. Kempton said he misspoke about that, but if the county is looking for Innovate! Inc. to do an analysis, that analysis is written in the document that he provided Commissioners with this morning.
Commissioner Bertling said this is talking about a fulltime position and the county is going to spend more money regardless so how do we get to the endgame faster. Commissioner Bertling commented about having someone from an outside company analyze the process as you don’t want to have someone analyzing their own position. Ms. Nelson asked if the analysis will include the various positions working on applications and she questioned how to get together to say “this” is what we’re doing. Chairman Dinning said Boundary County went from 0 to 100 as far as how busy it got, but at the level of 100, it’s eating up Ms. Nelson, Mr. Morris and Mr. Kempton’s time so it would be wrong for Commissioners not to look at this. Ms. Nelson said she just wants to know why everyone can’t be involved.
Commissioner Bertling said he could be wrong, but he’s hearing Mr. Kempton saying that he knows how to analyze what is wrong with the process, but he’s never been asked or approached to do that. Commissioners just brought in Innovate! Inc. and did not ask staff to analyze the process. That’s what he’s hearing.
Mr. Kempton said Commissioners need to analyze his plan going forward. Mr. Kempton spoke of the angry calls he receives from the public about the time it takes and he said it seems there is no desire to use his growth or expertise. Mr. Kempton commented that maybe he can do schooling and also do what is needed for the county. Mr. Kempton stated that he’s not interested in making $18.00 as a fulltime employee as it’s not worth the grief for that pay, especially seeing the compensation that Ruen-Yeager is contracted for. Mr. Kempton said he would be interested in more hours if the compensation was higher.
Chairman Dinning said Commissioners have been given information to think about. Commissioner Bertling said under the current circumstances, Commissioners need to increase hours for the addressing position and he questioned if it will include more hours in the future. It was said that when Gary Falcon worked for the county, he did mapping, approaches, etc., but there is no way one person could do those tasks today.
Attorney Hull said if someone was getting information for Ms. Nelson, such as making the phone calls and do the follow-up and then bring Ms. Nelson the final file for her to look at, would that alleviate her time. Ms. Nelson said greatly and she added that County Mapper Olivia Drake had started to try doing that, but then it just got so busy.
Attorney Hull commented about the deficiencies mentioned and he said that Mr. Kempton is stating that Commissioners don’t need to hire Innovate! Inc. to analyze the process as that is something he can do. Mr. Kempton said his vision wasn’t seeing himself doing a study alone; it was sitting down together, which is something they don’t do. A lot could be solved just by doing that and it would be a collaborative. Innovate! Inc. yes, could bring some expertise in some regards. Attorney Hull said he understands Commissioners’ comments and the points Mr. Kempton is making and he added that the county needs to have a vision of where it wants to go and they need to be prepared for that next level. Attorney Hull said he’s trying to determine how to get the process started, such as having employees sit down or have an outside firm come in.
Mr. Kempton said Innovate! Inc. might come back and talk about needing to share data and provide solutions and that is something he can do. Commissioner Bertling said one way or the other he sees the addressing coordinator position as going to be fulltime, because the problem is not going away; not very quickly anyway. Ms. Nelson said when Mr. Falcon retired, Commissioners had a discussion about whether or not that position needed to be replaced and since the mapping had been done it was just maintenance, but nothing more was ever heard about it. It was said that there will come a time when that mapping needs to be done and maintained.
Mr. Morris mentioned budgeting in relation to the address coordinator position becoming fulltime.
Commissioner Bertling said this conversation should’ve been held some time ago. Ms. Nelson said she didn’t want to overstep what the Commissioners might want to do, but she felt it needed to be discussed. Attorney Hull said he doesn’t think Commissioners were intending to offend Road and Bridge by inviting Innovate! Inc. to meet with them. Ms. Nelson said she was not offended, but they realized Commissioners really were looking into this and they needed to provide options that could be discussed.
Mr. Kempton left the meeting at 10:04 a.m.
Chairman Dinning said before meeting with Innovate!, Inc., they had a meeting involving the local title companies and Commissioners thought that anything that dealt with county approaches and any easements associated had to touch a county road. Commissioners had thought they stated that the county doesn’t need to worry about chasing down easements to a secondary parcel beyond the initial parcel as that would not be county responsibility. Attorney Hull said yes, from a private standpoint, an access would be guaranteed, but if not, a statement would be made. The issue that is still there is if there is an easement and it touches a parcel at “this particular location” and the landowner wants an approach at a different location, there needs to be proof that the easement touches the county road and approaches, but everything back beyond that is private. Attorney Hull said he understands and that beyond the county right-of-way is not the county’s business and he said he thinks Ms. Nelson is having to spend a lot of time researching this when a landowner mentions that the title company says there is no legal access. Chairman Dinning said the county only has jurisdiction over the approach. Is it county responsibility to spend hours researching easements and is there a better way to do that? Attorney Hull said it’s addressing that provides a problem. Ms. Nelson said if people give them an easement document for one location to another, but they want to have an approach in another location, Road and Bridge can write a disclaimer and Mr. Kempton assesses that address with the disclaimer. Attorney Hull said it already is off the county road, but it’s the address that’s the problem. Ms. Nelson said the address is based off the center of the approach. If there is an approach, Road and Bridge is not going to research titles and there will be a disclaimer about not guaranteeing access. It was said that should be done for every approach, unless the approach goes from the county road to the subject property. Attorney Hull said he would just include a disclaimer for every approach. Ms. Nelson briefly questioned the scenario and Chairman Dinning said in this case this is an existing approach. Ms. Nelson said there are a lot of non-existing approaches. Chairman Dinning said the property owner would need to provide a document showing the easement and to prove where the new approach hits the county road anyway.
Chairman Dinning said what Commissioners understood happening is that Ms. Nelson ends up tracking all of those legal descriptions to make sure the easement reaches back to a property. Ms. Nelson added that it’s also to see the approach. Chairman Dinning said the county is not here to do the work of a title company or private individual; that’s not county responsibility.
Commissioner Cossairt said it’s not up to the county to determine access between neighbors, it’s between the neighbors.
Ms. Vogel explained how the process worked for Bonner County.
Ms. Nelson said if it’s an existing approach and someone drove their truck up that approach to log and now the access does not meet standards and the property owner wants to split the property or build a house, does she need to check to make sure the approach is up to standards. Chairman Dinning explained that Commissioners just did that with the variance requested by Edd Byler on Smith Lake Road. Attorney Hull questioned what the county does with a goat trail that’s in existence that is not wide enough, has no culvert, etc. Will that trail need to be upgraded or is the county saying it shouldn’t be a concern. Commissioner Bertling said that access should be addressed and improved. Ms. Nelson explained that a driveway is only a certain width, but a roadway needs to be wider, etc.
10:38 a.m., Chief Probation Officer Stacy Brown joined the meeting.
Chairman Dinning said we’re here to serve the public and when we start following an ordinance that doesn’t serve the public, we need to fix the ordinance. We will have all kinds of situations that will not meet the ordinance, but yet the public expects the county to figure out a solution and offer it to them. Attorney Hull said that is what he thinks the variance process allows to happen. You have to have standards so you don’t have chaos, but there will be unique situations and that is where the variance process applies. Ms. Nelson explained reasons for steps she takes in the application process being due to what she’s learned in various classes Road and Bridge has taken pertaining to roads, safety, traffic counts, etc.
The meeting with Ms. Nelson, Mr. Morris, Attorney Hull, and Ms. Vogel ended at 10:45 a.m.
Ms. Brown met with Commissioners to give the Probation Department report. Ms. Brown presented Commissioners with the Memorandum of Agreement to Support the Community Based Alternative Services Program and the Substance Use Disorder Services Program. Ms. Brown explained that this program is to use funds from the state for juveniles if they need any community based resources that their parents can’t afford, so this program will allow affordability.
Commissioner Cossairt moved to sign the Memorandum of Agreement to support the Community Based Alternative Services (CBAS) Program and the Substance Use Disorder Services (SUD) Program. Commissioner Bertling second. Motion passed unanimously.
Ms. Brown provided statistics for probation and she commented that cases are increasing.
The meeting with Ms. Brown ended at 10:51 a.m.
Commissioners reviewed claims for payment. Fund totals are as follows:
Current Expense $ 63,320.58
Road & Bridge 96,066.34
Airport 6,333.43
District Court 2,107.30
Justice Fund 45,914.02
911 Funds 6,430.35
Indigent & Charity 17,013.74
Parks and Recreation 3,643.72
Animal Damage Control 5,000.00
Reval 2,736.92
Solid Waste 89,192.83
Tort 86,979.07
Veterans Memorial 264.65
Weeds 1,593.46
Restorium 16,180.17
Waterways 197.05
Grant, Airport 1,915.65
Grant, Boat Safety 362.88
Grant, Fire Mitigation 48,909.04
TOTAL $494,161.20
Trusts
Auditor’s Trust - *Misc 8,392.94
Boundary Co. Drug Court Trust 519.84
Driver’s License Trust 10,000.50
Motor Vehicle Trust 223,084.69
Sheriff’s Trust Fund 1,072.60
Odyssey Court Trust Account 29,317.93
Odyssey Bond Trust Account 506,222.00
Odyssey Restitution Trust Acct 4,700.56
TOTAL $783,311.06
GRAND TOTAL $1,277,472.26
Citizens are invited to inspect detailed records on file in the Courthouse (individual claims & Commissioners’ allowance & warrant register record 2020-2021).
11:00 a.m., Dan Spinosa and Jared Yost with Innovate! Inc. joined the meeting to discuss the possibility of working together to analyze the county’s addressing process. Mr. Spinosa reviewed and explained the quote provided and he commented that the county doesn’t necessarily have a staffing issue, but more-so the issue is related to integrating a system for sharing data. Mr. Spinosa said their quote is for time and materials in a work order, but they can stop at any point. Innovate! Inc. can also assess where the county is at for GIS. The goal, in a nutshell, is looking at the process that might be a pinch point, etc. The last point is what the county has, and it does have an existing license for the Cloud that could give an idea, but it’s not something you would want to use long term. It would be something tangible. Chairman Dinning asked how long the process is anticipated to take. Mr. Spinosa said maybe some of these tasks would be needed for the county budget period and it’s whatever will work for the county.
Mr. Yost said the biggest thing is getting the county’s needs on paper and provide the information on technology. We just need to understand all of the problems the county wants to solve; just to understand what the pain points really are so Commissioners have a road map in which to solve those problems. It’s understanding the problem and investigating what is wanted to be accomplished as the starting point, according to Mr. Yost.
Mr. Spinosa said it depends on budget and what can make that work. Chairman Dinning said Commissioners are ignorant of the process, but are now getting a clear picture of how Ruen-Yeager and GIS interacts with addressing and Road and Bridge with approach permits, etc. Commissioners don’t have a clear picture of where something needs to be fixed.
Mr. Yost said from the outside looking in, it is data accessibility. The GIS system can consolidate information into one view. How information is stored is up to each department and they can help consolidate that data to make the process more efficient.
Mr. Spinosa asked what would help Commissioners have a clearer view so when they make sure they do something in the proposal, it’s something that helps Commissioners. Commissioner Bertling listed getting monthly updates. Chairman Dinning said what we deal with are members of the public who are not happy with the service the county provides so Commissioners are trying to figure out how to improve our service. Commissioner Bertling said connectivity sounds like the biggest key. Chairman Dinning said we can have the best technology in the world, but if the employees are not using it, then it doesn’t matter.
Mr. Yost said when they worked with the City of Sandpoint, they had basic GIS data layers and he was able to build that dashboard and that would allow someone the ability to stop in the Planning and Zoning Office and ask Planning and Zoning Administrator what they need and ask questions about zoning, easements, etc., and then insert those layers of information into the computer system so the customer could be shown this information immediately and not lose time over the phone trying to understand. Rather than a week later, some questions can be answered immediately, because the data is right in front of them.
Chairman Dinning said that was brought up today and when Mr. Falcon worked on addressing for the county in the past, he built layers into the system, but he doesn’t think that system has been updated. Mr. Yost said the county probably has a good foundation, but it will just need to be updated. Mr. Yost said the county would need to make the employees using this data have some ownership in system. Such as if someone works in the street department, they would be provided the ability to insert into the system where potholes are located or where streets are failing etc., but when those departments had ownership, they could enter information themselves. If an employee is not using the data, they will not buy into it. If a system is built that is easy to use, employees will want more.
Commissioner Cossairt said costs are always a big deal. We can’t afford the biggest and greatest, but we need a system that works. Mr. Spinosa said they could provide Commissioners with options. Chairman Dinning said Commissioners are looking into it and figuring out the best options, but we’re not tech savvy. In having this technology, it would help in leaps and bounds and it would reduce the impact on staff in having information readily available. Commissioner Bertling said there is the initial outlay costs, but the payback is huge.
Mr. Spinosa said their program is custom and they want to work with the county. Chairman Dinning spoke of the analyzation of the county process and is it or is it not failing and he asked if that is a part of the proposal. Mr. Spinosa said yes, and he spoke of having meetings, but if needs change, that can be addressed. Chairman Dinning said Commissioners have a lot to think about. Commissioners will review the information and get back to Mr. Spinosa and Mr. Yost. Mr. Yost said if Commissioners have set aside budget for this type of work, they can work that out to fit the needs so it can be scaled back if need be.
The meeting with Mr. Spinosa and Mr. Yost ended at 11:27 a.m.
Commissioner Cossairt moved to approve the minutes for the weeks of May 24, 2021, and May 31, 2021. Commissioner Bertling second. Motion passed unanimously.
Commissioner Cossairt moved to approve the amended minutes for the week of April 5, 2021. Commissioner Bertling second. Motion passed unanimously.
Commissioner Cossairt moved to sign the Catering Permit for A & P Bar and Grill. Commissioner Bertling second. Motion passed unanimously.
Commissioner Bertling signed Certificates of Residency for Zachry Medearis and Brooke Torgerson. Commissioner Cossairt second. Motion passed unanimously.
Commissioner Cossairt moved to approve the New Private Road Name Request Form for Dancing Lawn Way. Commissioner Bertling second. Motion passed unanimously.
Commissioner Cossairt moved to sign the Findings and Decision for Variance #6-2021, Porthill Loop-Shem Johnson, Road Standards Variance Request. Commissioner Bertling second. Motion passed unanimously.
Commissioners tended to administrative duties.
Commissioners recessed for lunch at 12:05 p.m.
1:30 p.m., Commissioners reconvened for the afternoon session with Chairman Dan Dinning, Commissioner Wally Cossairt, Commissioner Tim Bertling, Clerk Glenda Poston, and Deputy Clerk Michelle Rohrwasser.
1:30 p.m., Airport Manager Dave Parker joined the meeting to discuss the possible changes to the Fixed Base Operator Agreement. Those present reviewed bullet points noted by the County Civil Attorney to look over before finalizing the agreement.
Chairman Dinning said the way the agreement is written now is that it can extend for an additional 10 years and it states in one section that the rent in the agreement shall be renegotiated every two years, but in another section it states the rent amount shall increase 2% annually so that is probably the conflict Attorney Hull is talking about. The second paragraph in Section two says the parties “shall” renegotiate. Both Commissioners and Mr. Parker agreed that this statement can say may renegotiate as opposed to shall.
Chairman Dinning asked what Commissioners think of the monthly rental amount as it has been many years and it has not been renegotiated. Mr. Parker mentioned the agreement was to increase 2% per year every year, but when the trailer was sold, the Airport Board was not receiving any rental income so they thought the rent amount was reasonable. Chairman Dinning said there are different ways to look at it. It does save the county, but when you look at the building, he doesn’t know what something like that would rent for. Mr. Parker said the square footage of the building is 30 feet by 30 feet. Commissioners discussed increasing the liability insurance to $2,000,000.00 per occurrence. Commissioners asked if $.05 per gallon is the going rate as it pertains to the operator paying for gallons of fuel sold and Mr. Parker said yes, the cost is pretty stable. The county would pay the cost for major repairs and a dollar amount should be listed. Those present listed what costs could be for various repairs and Commissioner Bertling suggested that major repairs be at a cost of $500.00 or more.
Clerk Poston listed off what the county provides such as services in the terminal and she questioned if all of the phone lines are needed. Mr. Parker said Northern Air has two phone lines and the county has the other two lines. Clerk Poston referred to minor repair necessities and she said she learned about a septic backup and she questioned why it hadn’t been submitted to Idaho Counties Risk Management Program (ICRMP) for insurance coverage. Mr. Parker said he really didn’t think it was a big deal. Clerk Poston said if we’re replacing things due to a sewage backup, we could’ve submitted the claim to ICRMP. Mr. Parker said a new shower stall was purchased as the backup occurred under the prior shower. The older shower had to be cut out so a new one was purchased. The fixtures are incredibly old, according to Mr. Parker.
Commissioner Cossairt said he would increase the rent amount to $400.00. Commissioner Bertling and Mr. Parker said they would be fine with that. Commissioners said they would get these changes to Attorney Hull.
Commissioner Bertling asked various questions about varying lease terms and lease increases.
The meeting with Mr. Parker ended at 2:04 p.m.
2:04 p.m., Solid Waste Department Superintendent Claine Skeen briefly joined the meeting at Commissioners’ request.
Mr. Skeen left the meeting at 2:09 a.m.
Road and Bridge Department Co-Superintendent Renee Nelson contacted Commissioners via telephone to ask a question regarding addressing in an area on the Upper Pack River Road. The county has the Schedule A with the Forest Service for maintenance and this property owner is outside of that area, but it is in Boundary County limits. Chairman Dinning said the county has no jurisdiction on federal ground. Ms. Nelson questioned if she is able to assign an address as there is already a road and road name. Commissioner Cossairt said he would just assign the address. Chairman Dinning suggested Ms. Nelson use the disclaimer that the road address might not be recognized by the Forest Service. Commissioners agreed.
The call to Ms. Nelson ended at 2:16 p.m.
Commissioner Cossairt moved to approve the minutes for the week of June 7, 2021. Commissioner Bertling second. Motion passed unanimously.
Commissioners tended to administrative duties.
There being no further business, the meeting recessed at 2:50 p.m.
***Tuesday, June 15, 2021, at 1:30 p.m., Commissioners met in regular session with Chairman Dan Dinning, Commissioner Wally Cossairt and Deputy Clerk Michelle Rohrwasser. Commissioner Tim Bertling was tending to other matters.
1:30 p.m., Commissioners held a continuation of the public hearing to consider Planning and Zoning Applications #20-072 and #21-033 for applicant LMJPNP, LLC. This is an application requesting approval to amend the Comprehensive Plan map and the zoning map from rural residential to suburban to allow a future residential subdivision of the land consistent with suburban density. Rural residential establishes a density of one dwelling unit per five acres; suburban is one dwelling per one acre where community water or sewer is available and 2.5 acres where neither service is available. The property consists of three parcels totaling approximately 55 acres. Present were: Chairman Dan Dinning, Commissioner Wally Cossairt, and Deputy Clerk Michelle Rohrwasser. The hearing was recorded.
Chairman Dinning stated that the hearing had been continued to allow staff to obtain information from the Federal Aviation Administration and that information has not been received as of yet so Commissioners will need to continue the hearing to Tuesday, July 20, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. The next hearing will take place at the County Annex as well.
Commissioner Cossairt moved to continue the public hearing for Planning and Zoning Applications #20-072 and #21-033 to Tuesday, July 20, 2021, at 1:30 p.m. at the County Annex. Chairman Dinning yielded the chair to second. Motion passed unanimously.
The hearing ended at 1:31 p.m.
Commissioner Cossairt moved to amend a prior motion made yesterday to sign the Caterpillar Finance documents for the second 140 all-wheel drive motor grader, Serial No. EB300346, to also include adopting Resolution 2021-20. A resolution regarding the governmental entity to lease, purchase and/or finance the 2021 Caterpillar 140 all-wheel drive motor grader through Western States CAT. Chairman Dinning yielded the chair to second. Motion passed unanimously. Resolution 2021-20 reads as follows:
Resolution 2021-20 can be located on the next page.
Recorded as instrument #287264
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 1:32 p.m.
_____________________________
DAN R. DINNING, Chairman
ATTEST:
_______________________________
GLENDA POSTON, Clerk
By: Michelle Rohrwasser, Deputy